File #: 21-0930    Version: 2
Type: Action Items -11:30 AM Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 9/24/2021 In control: Board of County Commissioners
On agenda: 10/26/2021 Final action:
Title: Special Improvement District
Attachments: 1. PRES SAD 20191015.pdf, 2. PRES SID 20211026-ADAapproved.pdf, 3. MSBU Program Policy FY21-ADAapproved.pdf, 4. Alachua County SID MSBU General Info Proposal FY 22-ADAapproved9-17-21.pdf, 5. Alachua County SID MSBU Proposal FY 23-ADAapproved9-20-21.pdf, 6. DraftOrdinanceInfrastructure SADADAapproved.pdf, 7. DraftULDCLanguageforMSBUADAapproved.pdf, 8. BA 2022-299 Reserves for SID, 9. Generl Fund Reserve Sheet
Related files: 22-0736
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
Agenda Item Name:
Title
Special Improvement District
End

Presenter:
Ramon D. Gavarrete

Description:
Staff is requesting Board approval to proceed with engaging Consultant for FY 22 and FY 23 to create SID for new neighborhoods.

Recommended Action:
Recommended Action
Staff is requesting Board approval to proceed with Consultant to create SID for new neighborhoods and approve budget adjustment 2022-299 to utilize General Fund Reserves to cover the FY22 cost of the consultant.
End

Prior Board Motions:
There were no prior motions

Fiscal Consideration:
Fiscal Consideration
The costs to administer the program would be up to $10,000 for FY22 and $48,500 for FY23. If the Board approves moving forward with engaging consultant, funding for FY22 will come from General Fund Reserves, funding for FY23 will be discussed during the FY23 budget process.

Excerpt from the County's Budget Management Policy - FY22
A. Reserve for contingency requests in the General Fund, MSTU Law Enforcement and MSBU Fire Funds must be approved by the Board of County Commissioners. The Board will use the procedures and evaluation criteria set forth in this, and other policies. Such requests will be evaluated as to the:
I. Urgency of the request
II. Scope of services to be provided
III. Short and long-term fiscal impact of the request
IV. Potential for alternative methods of funding or providing the service(s)
V. Review for duplication of service(s) with other agencies
VI. Review of efforts to secure non-County funding
VII. Discussion of why funding was not sought during the normal budget cycle
VIII. Review of the impact of not funding or delaying funding to the next fiscal year.

End

Strategic Guide:
Infrastructure

Background:
The Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) repeatedly received requests for citizens to improve their neighborhood streets. The BoCC has procedures in place to improve collector and arterial roads under its jurisdiction however there is not a set proces...

Click here for full text